Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Posted by bibbah
No comments | Wednesday, April 10, 2013
When a teacher gives a test, he or she is trying to measure students’
ability to recall and apply information learned over a particular
period of time. The exams make it relatively straightforward: Did the
student get an answer right or wrong? Was mastery of skills
demonstrated?
But how is creative or critical thought defined and taught? And by what assessment can we measure it, if at all?
Critical thinking is, among many things, the ability to understand
and apply the abstract, the ability to infer and to meaningfully
investigate. It’s the skills needed to see parallels, comprehend
intersections, identify problems, and develop sustainable solutions.
According to the Foundation for Critical Thinking, sound critical
thinking is imperative to social progress. It is with our thoughts that
we shape the world: Thinking creatively shapes social and cultural
structures. It affects the way blame is placed, the way ideas of right
and wrong are developed, the way leaders are elected, and the way we
understand our place in the world as individuals and as a collective. It
helps define, or complicate, who “we” are in the first place.
Teaching critical and creative thought, however, is challenging:
First, critical thinking may mean different things to different
instructors, principals, and/or districts. Second, it can be hard to
know what students are taking away from lessons and curricula designed
to cultivate critical thinking skills.
There are ways to navigate through these obstacles: Cultivating
critical thinking may be accomplished with modeling. A teacher may
explicitly show students how to make connections between their
experiences and those of others, show them how to link pieces of
literature, or explain the relationship between a piece of modern music
infused with metaphor and the poetry lesson from last month. Particular
curricula, ones that ask students not just when and where things
happened, but why and how, and what contemporary parallels can be drawn,
can enhance these skills.
Critical thinking can also be elicited in less directive ways: School
trips, service learning requirements, and various other kinds of
hands-on situations allow students to make connections at their own
pace. In any case, critical thinking skills are probably best infused
over months and years, the result of both direct and more subtle
instruction, during which teachers suggest, and insist, that students
investigate further, making—but more importantly, justifying—inferences
and conclusions.
Students at Codman Academy Charter Public School in Dorchester,
Massachusetts, engage in so-called “expeditionary learning” projects,
which are designed around a topic (for example, botany or urban renewal
in a particular city) selected by the students or their teachers.
Through research, participating in service learning, talking with
seasoned professionals within a particular industry, fieldwork, and by
preparing presentations and papers on their topics to share with their
schoolmates and the larger community, students build critical and
problem solving skills that will serve them for life.
So, if it is possible to teach this type of thinking, how then can we
measure if students are developing these skills? This is likely the
more confounding question. It’s hard to design test questions that
effectively measure a child’s ability think creatively. One way may be
to scaffold questions that increase in complexity and demand, which may
allow students the opportunity to reiterate, to explain, and then to
synthesize information they’ve gathered. Asking students to make
connections between different strands of a curriculum may also be a good
way to measure these skills. Assessments may also come in more
spontaneous moments, when a child responds to a question or a moment
with quiet brilliance or sensitivity. (It may be, however, that the
most meaningful measurement takes place once a student is launched into
the adult world.)
At the heart of teaching critical and creative thought is the ability
to ask the right questions to students. In turn, they need to be able
answer in a way that demonstrates their ability to see the parallels and
intersections; perceive linkages between historical moments, between
the period and the art, between the circumstances then and now; to
comprehend the relationship between “us” and “them”, between “we” and
“they,” and, ultimately, whether dichotomies like “we” and “they” are
useful—and, if so, how.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment