Monday, April 15, 2013
Posted by bibbah
No comments | Monday, April 15, 2013
I’m sure that we’ve all finished a day
in the classroom, sat in our chair, and asked ourselves “What’s the
point? Why do I do this job?”
We might find that we all ask these
questions for different reasons: standardized tests, students who can’t
read, students with behaviour problems, seemingly no support from
parents or administrators, more and more paperwork, feeling like we need
to prove ourselves, more curriculum to teach, less time in our
classrooms with our kids, feeling like we are not just teachers but also
doctors, psychologist, priests, counsellors, speech paths, police
officers, parents…
I have felt all of these things at one
time or another during my 10 years teaching. Some years are better than
others. Some groups are better than others. Overall, the good times
have far outweighed the bad, which is why I am still teaching. However,
it is still makes me think: What is the point of teaching? I look at
this question now not in the defeated way mentioned at the beginning of
this blog post, but in an objective, overall purpose way: What is the
goal of education and teaching? What do we want to accomplish?
In pondering this question, I read Nel Noddings’ 2005 article What Does It Mean to Educate the WHOLE CHILD?
Noddings begins her article by situating the climate created by the No
Child Left Behind policy in the United States. She underlines “its
unattainable main goal of 100 percent of students proficient in reading
and math by 2014.” (page 8 ) This statement seems to be making the
point that the goal of education is to make sure our kids can read and
do math. But is that it?
I share with you now a situation of a
child I once taught. It is a situation where most of us have
experienced similar feelings about a student. This boy that I taught
was very smart; very very smart. He was also very troubled
behaviourally. He was getting into all sorts of trouble at school. I
remember sitting with a colleague, trying to figure out how we could
reach this young boy, and saying: “This child will either be the head of
a Fortune-500 company or the head of a gang when he grows up.” I felt
so strongly that this boy had the smarts and the will to do anything
with his life and that it would all depend on the decisions he made
along the way. Noddings addresses this same idea on page 10 when she
says that “too many highly proficient people commit fraud, pursue paths
to success marked by greed, and care little about how their actions
affect the lives of others.”
So where does this lead me? I KNOW
that education and teaching is more that reading, ‘riting and
‘rithmatic. I KNOW that my role as teacher is more than just teaching
academic subject areas. But then, what is the goal? Noddings suggests
several different visions of what that goal is.
Regardless of which vision fits your
own, Noddings sums them up best: “They are meant to broaden our
thinking – to remind us to ask why we have chosen certain
curriculums, pedagogical methods, classroom arrangements, and learning
objectives. They remind us, too, that students are whole persons.”
(page 10)
This brings me back to the story of the
boy who could do anything. I did my job by teaching the academic
subjects. He could read, he could write, he could do math… But did I
do the rest of my job. I’d like to think that I tried. I tried to give
him a voice. It tried to teach him right from wrong. I tried to teach
him that we all have choices and that our choices affect us, those
around us, and that some decisions can go even further. I tried to
teach him that he can and does play a role in our society as a whole. I
tried to teach him that there is always more than one way to do things,
more than one right answer… I tried to teach him that people are of
value. Did he learn any of these things? I don’t know. He left our
school a couple of years after I taught him. I often wonder about him.
Noddings leaves us with a series of
questions (suggestions?) of how to more effectively lead to the
education of the whole child:
So in the end, my belief is that the
point of teaching IS to education the whole child. Although it IS
important to teach the students how to add, read, and craft a
well-written sentence, it is also my job to teach them the power of the
words they choose to use and the far-reaching effects of those words.
It is my job to teach them how to be a good friend and how to take
responsibility for their actions. It is my job to make them aware of
what is going on in the world and about how they can be a part of the
change they feel is needed. I’m not sure how, yet. I try things. I
try some of the things listed above. I try other things. I stumble, I
fail, I succeed, but I’m doing something. That’s my point. That’s why
I’m here. That’s why I teach.
So, what’s your point?
Noddings, N. (2005). What does it mean to educate the whole child? Educational Leadership, 63(1), 8-13.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment